artist name William Hogarth
title of work O, the Roast Beef of Old England
date created 1749
size 14"x10"
medium engraving
O, the Roast Beef of Old England is an engraving by the
incredible William Hogarth (we just picked up a lifetime print and it is
awesome.) It was originally a painting, and then translated into an engraving
shortly after. The print is a scene that takes place in England, as the name
suggests. The print makes use of a range of artistic elements to draw the
viewer in to the subject matter, and leave them pondering the potential content
of the piece. On the surface, the print depicts an aproned man carrying a large
knuckle of roast beef on a spike presumably towards some kind of dining
establishment. This is most definitely the focal point of the piece, though
through the use of perspective the artist creates an equally interesting
foreground and background. In the foreground a number of demonic looking women
stare at the face of a manta ray. Their faces seem to be morphing into one
homologous form mirroring that of the creature. Hogarth uses faces throughout
the piece both create implied lines focusing on the giant piece of meet thus
leading the viewer to the focal point. Hogarth also displays a wide range of
facial expressions ranging from perversion (on the friar) to utter desolation
(the man in the foreground on the right side of the piece). This sets an
atmosphere of wonder, though with slightly disconcerting undertones since the
majority of the faces are intensely unpleasant to look at.
Concretely
suggesting the content of the piece is a bit difficult given how much is going
on at once in the picture. It seems as if the piece of meat is the main point
of contention given that the soldiers look at it being carried away from them
with protest as they drink their presumably undesirable soup. If a famished
soldier is wantonly pouring some out onto the ground it surely cannot be of
that good. Passively in the background some religious elements are brought into
the piece. Perhaps Hogarth is making the statement that religion was less
important than the worldly needs of hunger and poverty, if the location is
taken literally when determining possible meaning.
No comments:
Post a Comment